The Value of ETH: A Comprehensive Analysis from Asset Logic to Business Strategy

·

By Konstantin Lomashuk & Artem Kotelskiy
Translated and edited by Odaily


Introduction: ETH as a Strategic Enterprise Asset

Recent developments show publicly traded companies reevaluating Ethereum's role. SharpLink Gaming plans to allocate up to $1 billion to acquire ETH as strategic reserves, while BTCS has purchased 3,450 ETH worth approximately $8.42 million. These moves signal ETH's evolution from "blockchain fuel" to a "corporate-level strategic asset."

This article systematically analyzes Ethereum's:

Key question: Why does ETH deserve long-term holding?


DeFi: Ethereum's First Product-Market Fit (PMF)

Ethereum's initial vision of a global, trustless computing platform found concrete validation through decentralized finance (DeFi). The 2018-2020 bear market saw critical developments:

The 2020 "DeFi Summer" demonstrated:

However, soaring gas fees exposed scalability limitations, prompting Ethereum's technical pivot.


Value Inflection Points: EIP-1559 to The Merge

EIP-1559: The Burn Mechanism (2021)

ETH burn mechanism visualization

The Merge (2022)


Rollup Era: Symbiosis or Parasitism?

Ethereum's scaling solution centers on Rollups—L2 chains that:

Key Dynamics:

AspectPre-Rollup EraRollup-Centric Era
Value FlowDirect to L1L2 aggregation → L1
Fee Structure100% to minersSplit L1/L2 economics
Scaling FocusL1 expansionModular (L1 security + L2 execution)

Emerging Debate: Do Rollups adequately compensate L1 for security/data services?


Evaluating ETH's Value: Business Logic Framework

ETH Valuation Components:

  1. Productive Asset Value (70%)

    • Discounted future fee revenue
    • Network security premium
  2. Monetary Premium (20%)

    • Store of value characteristics
  3. Speculative Premium (10%)

    • Meme/cultural value

Core thesis: Maximizing base-layer revenue strengthens all three components.


Ethereum vs. Solana: Strategic Differences

MetricEthereumSolana
Scaling ApproachModular (Rollups)Monolithic
Current TPS~15 (L1), 2000+ (L2)~4000
Node Decentralization800k+ validators<2k validators
Fee Revenue DriversDeFi, institutionalMemecoins (~50% volume)

Key Insight: Ethereum's security/decentralization provides moat against volatile meme economies.


Rollup Business Strategy: Three Pillars

  1. Expansion

    • Keep DA costs low (<$0.001/tx)
    • Target: 1M TPS capacity via PeerDAS
  2. Interoperability

    • Implement cross-Rollup standards (ERC-7683)
    • Reduce fragmentation for users/devs
  3. Differentiation

    • Leverage Ethereum's trust/liquidity moats
    • Attract institutional-grade Rollups

👉 Why Rollups Choose Ethereum DA


Value Accrual Pathways

Short-Term (2024-25)

Medium-Term (2026-28)

Long-Term (2029+)


FAQ Section

Q: How does ETH's burn rate compare to Bitcoin's halving?
A: EIP-1559's dynamic burn adapts to network usage, creating variable-but-predictable scarcity unlike Bitcoin's fixed schedule.

Q: Aren't Rollups just postponing L1 scaling?
A: No—Rollups complement upcoming L1 improvements (100x gas limit hikes) through specialized execution layers.

Q: Why hasn't ETH price reflected these fundamentals?
A: Market cycles lag technological milestones. As Rollups mature (2025+), value accrual will become more visible.

👉 Institutional ETH Adoption Trends


Disclaimer: This content represents market analysis only, not investment advice.